Monday, 22 August 2016

Why It Would be Beneficial for Jeremy Corbyn to Remain to be Leader of the Labour Party



Initially, this statement appears to be a bold one to make. For the most part, Corbyn’s ideology is backward and illogical. His political outlook is similar to that of a bohemian, self-loathing, student who relishes in being against things purely for the sake of it. However, as we are currently seeing, the establishment has been attempting to oust Corbyn from his position as leader. While this has been on going since his promotion to leader in 2015, the call for him to step down has amplified considerably post-Brexit. When Corbyn’s ideas and the way in which he has lead the Labour Party are put under scrutiny, his role may actually benefit those on the political right. And for these reasons, we must hope that the establishment fails to oust him.

First and fore mostly, Corbyn is deep down a Eurosceptic and a supporter of Brexit. This could prove to a pivotal factor in our upcoming withdrawal from the European Union. While at least in public he backed the Remain campaign, it is blatantly obvious that he was forced to do so by his party. For decades Corbyn has been a very vocal critic of the European Union and of our membership. It is highly doubtful that Corbyn shunned his Euroscepticism entirely overnight in the run up to the referendum. Further still, many ‘traditional’ Labour supporters and working class members of the electorate voted Leave. Therefore it would not be a surprise if Corbyn made a U-turn and returned back to his Eurosceptic roots as a means of gaining the support of working class Brexit voters. This would be a major blow to the Europhile establishment. Although this could prove to be a double edged sword. If Corbyn were to return to publically being a Eurosceptic, this may have an impact on the working class support for right wing Conservatives and UKIP. Regardless of this, the potential increased support of the Labour Party would only be a minor concern. By embracing Eurosceptism once more, the Europhile establishment would be faced with a formidable Eurosceptic national voice, spanning the entire political spectrum. This could very well ensure a better deal once Article 50 has been triggered, while also meaning that it would come sooner rather than later. To be able to watch the establishment cower in horror at another surge in Euroscepticism would make backing Corbyn (despite his ideological differences) worthwhile.

Corbyn’s unashamedly obvious disdain for the political establishment has always been something worth admiring about the Labour leader, despite his dishevelled appearance and socialist tendencies. Ironically, he has this explicit disdain for the establishment in common with leading figures on the right. In this sense, it is worthwhile supporting him in the constant battle with the press and the political establishment that even now still has the stench of Blairite politics about it. Again, this is not to say that we must support Corbyn’s policies. But it is refreshing to have a Labour leader who is not backed by countless moronic celebrities, big media and other establishment heavyweights. Much like those on the right, Corbyn has longed to see the destruction of a political stage that is dominated by a cosy, elitist political class. Ever since Blair became leader in 1994, the Labour Party has ditched its traditional supporters. It has sold out. It is much more concerned about being backed by wealthy, upper middle-class Londoners rather than working class families in the industrial north. Yet, Corbyn is by no means a modern day Keir Hardie. A comparison to Michael Foot would perhaps be more accurate. And it is with Michael Foot that Corbyn shares two crucial concepts. Both have been portrayed as anti establishment, and both oversaw the downfall of their own parties.

Aforementioned, both Michael Foot and Jeremy Corbyn are seen as political outsiders, even by the standards of those on the modern day left. And much like Michael Foot did with his 1983 manifesto that became the ‘longest suicide note in history’, Corbyn too may very well accelerate the destruction of his own party. While the potential increased public support for Euroscepticism under Corbyn would be beneficial, the downfall of the Labour Party would potentially be of a greater benefit to those on the right. As was with Michael Foot, Corbyn’s policies are out of date (at least for the most part) in terms of the desires of the electorate. They instead belong to the ramblings of a student union, not within a party’s national manifesto. We could therefore in the future see an even greater shift of working class votes go to both the Conservative Party, and even more so to UKIP. So far Corbyn’s leadership has divided the party. Leading figures such as Hilary Benn have left the shadow cabinet, while Labour Party members are becoming increasingly more sceptical and pessimistic about their own party. And as the general election proved in 2015, Labour’s support is waning considerably. Unfortunately for those on the left, the toxic legacy of Blairite politics still haunts the Labour Party.

Corbyn is anti-establishment. And despite his superficial backing of the Remain campaign, Corbyn is fundamentally a Eurosceptic. Both of these factors could prove to be crucial in both the gradual but inevitable destruction of the current political establishment, and also in the triggering of Article 50 along with the negotiations of Brexit. However, with all things said, the number one reason why it will be of benefit for Corbyn to remain to be leader is that it will ensure the destruction of the Labour Party. Due to the contempt that the hard line left wing members and the Blairite members of the party have for one another, along with the party’s abandonment of the working class, the Labour Party is on its way out. If however Corbyn does not remain to be leader, the party will still continue to self implode. Although this would result in the establishment gaining another figurehead – in the form of yet another Blairite. Thus for the right to make the most out of the Labour Party’s downfall, we must hope that Jeremy Corbyn remains to be its leader. 




No comments:

Post a Comment